-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Abc #5934
Abc #5934
Conversation
@1422756921 is attempting to deploy a commit to the NextChat Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
Warning Rate limit exceeded@1422756921 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 20 minutes and 54 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (5)
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several modifications across multiple components, primarily enhancing user guidance and localization. The Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 7
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
app/layout.tsx (1)
13-13
: Consider internationalizing the application titleThe hardcoded Chinese title "ChatGPT-青云依兮" might affect accessibility for non-Chinese users. Consider:
- Using a translation system for the title based on user's locale
- Providing a romanized version alongside Chinese characters
Also applies to: 25-25
app/components/sidebar.tsx (1)
191-196
: Add accessibility attributes to the linkThe new link lacks proper accessibility attributes. Add
rel="noopener noreferrer"
for security andaria-label
for screen readers.- <a href={FAKA_URL} target="_blank"> + <a href={FAKA_URL} target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" aria-label={Locale.Mask.faka}>app/locales/cn.ts (1)
14-18
: Improve message formatting consistencyThe authentication messages mix Chinese and English terms without proper spacing. Add spaces between Chinese characters and English terms for better readability.
- Title: "需要访问密码或者key", + Title: "需要访问密码或者 Key", - Tips1: "访问密码和key只需填一个即可", + Tips1: "访问密码和 Key 只需填一个即可",app/locales/tw.ts (2)
14-20
: Standardize character set and text formattingThe Auth section needs improvement in character consistency and spacing.
Apply these improvements:
- Title: "需要访问密码或者key", - Tips: "管理员开启了验证,请在下方填入访问密码", + Title: "需要存取密碼或者 Key", + Tips: "管理員開啟了驗證,請在下方填入存取密碼",Add consistent spacing around English terms (e.g., "API Key" instead of "APIKey" or "key").
411-413
: Maintain consistent Traditional Chinese usageThe Mask section uses simplified Chinese characters.
Apply these corrections:
- blog: "青云博客", - faka: "购买卡密", - Name: "面具", + blog: "青雲部落格", + faka: "購買卡密", + Name: "面具",
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
app/components/auth.tsx
(2 hunks)app/components/sidebar.tsx
(3 hunks)app/constant.ts
(1 hunks)app/layout.tsx
(2 hunks)app/locales/cn.ts
(3 hunks)app/locales/en.ts
(2 hunks)app/locales/id.ts
(1 hunks)app/locales/tw.ts
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
app/components/auth.tsx (1)
41-41
: LGTM! Enhanced user guidance with proper localization
The additional tips improve the authentication experience while maintaining proper internationalization through the Locale system.
Also applies to: 57-57
app/constant.ts (1)
3-4
: Verify the legitimacy and accessibility of external services
Let's verify these external services are legitimate and accessible.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
app/components/auth.tsx (3)
41-41
: Remove unnecessary empty linesThese empty lines don't contribute to code readability and should be removed.
Also applies to: 57-57
Line range hint
58-77
: Enhance security and accessibility of API key inputsWhile the implementation is functional, consider these improvements:
- Add basic API key format validation
- Add aria-labels for better accessibility
- Consider extracting the repeated input pattern into a reusable component
<input className={styles["auth-input"]} type="password" + aria-label="OpenAI API Key Input" + pattern="^sk-[a-zA-Z0-9]{48}$" placeholder={Locale.Settings.Access.OpenAI.ApiKey.Placeholder} value={accessStore.openaiApiKey} onChange={(e) => { accessStore.update( (access) => (access.openaiApiKey = e.currentTarget.value), ); }} />
Line range hint
20-26
: Fix incomplete reset functionality in resetAccessCodeThe resetAccessCode function doesn't reset the googleApiKey, which could lead to inconsistent state.
const resetAccessCode = () => { accessStore.update((access) => { access.openaiApiKey = ""; access.accessCode = ""; + access.googleApiKey = ""; }); };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
app/components/auth.tsx
(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
app/components/auth.tsx (2)
Line range hint 32-93
: Enhance user experience with loading and error states
Consider adding:
- Loading indicators during API key validation
- Error messages for invalid inputs
- Success feedback after successful authentication
Let's check if there are any existing error handling patterns in the codebase:
✅ Verification successful
Add loading and error states to enhance authentication UX
The codebase already has patterns for handling loading states and errors, but they're not implemented in the auth component. Consider implementing:
- Loading state during API key validation:
const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(false);
// Use with IconButton
icon={isLoading ? <LoadingButtonIcon /> : undefined}
disabled={isLoading}
- Error feedback for invalid inputs:
const [error, setError] = useState("");
// Add below inputs
{error && <div className="error">{error}</div>}
- Success feedback using existing pattern from settings.tsx:
const [authState, setAuthState] = useState<"none" | "success" | "failed">("none");
// Show success icon when validated
{authState === "success" && <CloudSuccessIcon />}
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for error handling patterns in React components
rg -t tsx "catch|error|invalid" app/components/
Length of output: 77
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for error handling patterns in React components with proper file extension
rg "catch|error|invalid" app/components/ --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx' --type tsx
# Also check for any existing loading state patterns
rg "loading|isLoading|spinner" app/components/ --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx' --type tsx
# Look for any validation or feedback related code
rg "validate|success|feedback" app/components/ --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx' --type tsx
Length of output: 4708
Line range hint 1-93
: Verify the impact of new API key functionality
Please ensure that:
- Existing authentication flows still work with just the access code
- The new API key functionality is properly documented
- Error messages in localization files are updated for the new fields
Let's verify the localization and documentation:
✅ Verification successful
Let me verify the localization files more thoroughly to ensure all API key related messages are properly set up:
API key functionality is properly integrated and documented
Based on the verification results:
- Localization strings for all API key types (OpenAI, Azure, Google, Anthropic) are properly defined with titles, subtitles, and placeholders
- Documentation clearly explains API key configuration through environment variables and includes the
HIDE_USER_API_KEY
option - The auth component correctly handles both access code and API key scenarios through the access store
The implementation maintains backward compatibility:
- Access code remains the primary authentication method
- API key input is optional and can be hidden via
HIDE_USER_API_KEY
- Each API provider has dedicated configuration sections
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check localization files for API key related strings
rg -t ts "ApiKey" app/locales/
# Check documentation for API key usage
fd -t f "README|CONTRIBUTING" -x cat {} \; | rg -i "api.?key"
Length of output: 3023
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the structure of API key related messages in English locale
rg -A 5 "ApiKey" app/locales/en.ts
# Check for any error messages related to API keys
rg -i "error|invalid|missing" app/locales/en.ts | rg -i "api.?key"
# Check the access store implementation for API key handling
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_Store {
$$$
update($_) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
Length of output: 895
1 |
💻 变更类型 | Change Type
🔀 变更说明 | Description of Change
📝 补充信息 | Additional Information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation